Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar during the meeting with the President of the Bar Association in Pandjab and Haryan High Court Association Sartej Singh Nrula, vice president of Niles Bhadwaj, Honorry Securery Gagandep Jammu, and defended by Ashish Bisno in Raj Bhavan, Chandigarh. Photo: @vpindia via PTI
It is a parliamentary proposal to eliminate the justice Yashwant Varma Answer, Vice -President Jagdeep Dhankhar, asked the assembly of the Panjab and Haryan High Court Association in Chandigarh on Friday (June 6, 2025).
The Minister of Parliamentary Affairs Kiren Rijija said on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) that the government will bring a resolution in the monsoon meeting for a proposal against the judiciary against the judiciary. Judge Varma was the subject of the probe subject of the probe of the appointed panel after a fire in his residence in Delhi, which led to the discovery of several burned bags of cash in the canal.
Mr. Dhankhar said that the government of the day was affected by the three -year court order that did not allow him to register the first information report (companies) without permission to judiciary. Vice-President said, “So I ask myself a question for myself, in deep pain, concerned, concerned, anxiety-for this permission was not given?
He also asked why even after the Supreme Court probe was not punished by the judge Varma. “I was problem. In the end, if the proposal is to be removed by the judge, it is an answer? If there has been an offense, a closing act that shakes the foundations of democracy – a rule of law, why wasn’t it punished?
The permit was to be granted soon after the discovery of cash, and if not, it should appear at least when the Supreme Court submitted its report with regard to the “compulsive and advantageous situation”. Mr. Dhankhar said that “apparently stained, unanswered, illegal and unexplained” was obviously stained, and the system must move to find out “whose money is”.
He also asked: “They influenced the money of the judiciary in judicial work? All these problems are agitated not only by the minds of the lawyers but also by the streets on the street. But let the lid throws out of a can of worms.
The gap between “may be true” and “must be true,” said vice -president, he is very thin. “But this thin distance must be agreed by evidence of insurmountability.
Published – 6 June 2025 20:32
