Team members are looking for human remains or any other clue in the ruins of the Pashamylaram explosion in Sigachi Industries in the Sangareddy district. Photo: MoHD Arif / The Hindu (Stringer) | Photo Credit: MoHD Arif
On Thursday, the Theangana High Court issued a notice to the State Government and the head of various departments, such as work, home, industry, along with Sigachi, a petition looking for a special investigation team to explore the explosion in the Sigachi industrial unit in Banaor.
The bench of the main judge Aparesh Kumar Singh and the justice Gouse Meera Mohiuddin ordered respondents, including the main secretary, special Minister of the Interior, Council for Control of Pollution, Collector Sangareddy and Sigachi Administration to submit detailed countermeasures until 27 August. June 30 to repair the company’s responsibility and guilt.
The petitioner wanted the HC to introduce different government wings to identify the hazard that represents the accumulation of industrial dust, the absence of a risk assessment system, and align Indian security protocols with global standards such as NFPA 652. Sigor firefighting plans that were on the basis of fire accidents. The victims included eight missing factory staff.
CJ, seeking the Radci’s answers to the state, said the government should not take action as an opponent. The state should make its best efforts to help the victims’ families, he said. The respondents ordered to submit comprehensive countermeasures that respond to different points raised by the petitioner, the bench noted that time should not reduce the tragedy or be forgotten.
The bench tried to know the details of the first information report, various sections of the law caused in the case of and progress of the investigation. The bench also asked the government’s prosecutor to home if there was any arrest in this case. GP replied that no man had been arrested yet. The bench wanted respondents to provide accurate details, such as how many workers were present on the spot when a fire accident was reported, what laws were caused to be responsible, the categories of workers and the amounts of compensation paid in the counterats.
Another general advocate of T. Rajanikant Reddy reported the bench that all the problems raised in the PIL petition were immersed and events began. He was looking for four weeks of time to file a countermeasures against contradictory statements and declared that the authorities were waiting for a high -level committee and an expert committee.
Published – 31 July 2025 21:42
