
On Monday, the Supreme Court awarded protection against arrest actors Shreyas Talpad in the case of alleged financial fraud, including a cooperative company based in Haryana, accused of cheating investors.
Justices BV Nagarathn and KV Viswanathan issued a announcement to Police Haryan and others for an action for actors.
What is this
Another police commissioner, Murthal, Sonipat, andjet Singh said the complaint was against the investigation of a more marketing company.
It is said that Talpads were promoted by a cooperative company as its brand ambassador and that its approval had forced public members to invest in the company’s financial programs.
“It was claimed to be her ambassadors of the brand and the victims were tempted to invest for these personalities. They were named in a complaint. The company was registered. Now they will be investigated as their role,” the act said.
Thirteen people, including actors and Ambassadors of Shreyas Talpad and the NATH, were reserved for a complaint of 37 -year -old resident Sonipat Vipul Antil.
Antel claimed that both actors “promoted the human credit company LTD as a brand ambassador”.
What did the complaint mention?
According to the complaint, the cooperative company concerned was registered under the Act on Multiple Cooperative Companies and, since September 16, 2016, began to operate across several countries, including Haryana.
The company offered salvation schemes such as fixed deposits and recurring deposits, and even presented itself as a safe and reliable financial institution. The company, supported by extensive advertising, attracted a large number of investors through a multi -level marketing model that led to a rapid expansion.
To attract people, the company promised high returns and provided investors that their money was safe and paid out in time. Over the first few years, the company maintained a step with payments, building investors Trust, PTI reported.
By 2023, however, the complaint states that the payments began to disappear. When investors began to monitor, the company officials quoted the “upgrades of the system” to justify the delay. Despite repeated questions, investors and agents were allegedly encountered with vague excuses and false assurances of officials.
Antel claimed that when investors and agents approached society officials, they got a false assurance.
(Tagstotranslate) Shreyas Talpade Haryan Marketing Case (T) Shreyas Talpade (T) SCEKEYAS TALPADE