On Thursday, the Supreme Court killed the Directorate for Pravo (ED) for “exceeding all limits” and undermining the federal structure of public affairs. The court made remarks and at the same time remained an investigation of the money laundering ED for the retailer with the spirits of Tamil Nadu, Tasmac, over alleged corruption in issuing wine licenses.
Here’s what the Supreme Court said
Issuing ED notifications of action filed by Tamil Nadu and Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (Tasmac), a bench including chief judge Bror Gavai and Justine Augustine George Masih told another general lawyer St. Raja, who appears for the agency to run. ”
“The Directorate for enforcement of law violates the federal concept (public administration),” said the bench, adding that the ED probe would not continue against the state Tasmac.
The lawyer was against the command and said the problem included corruption £1,000 crore and ED will not exceed the limits “at least in this case”.
The bench took note of the submission of older advocates chapels Siber and Amit Nand Tiwari that the state itself has filed more than 40 fir in cases related to the license for alcohol trade since 2014 and now Ed will jump in the picture and attack Tasmac.
“How can you attack the state Tasmac,” Lavička asked.
The government of Tamil Nadu led by DMK and Tasmac turned to the Supreme Court, which challenged ED raids in Tasmac.
Their petitions questioned April 23, the order of the Madras High Court, which dismissed their objections and allowed ED to continue its investigation under the Act on Money Washing Prevention (PMLA).
However, the Supreme Court remained Ed’s probe and expressed concern about the agency’s conduct and their consequences for the federal structure of the Public Affairs Administration.
(With the entry from agencies)
(Tagstotranslate) Supreme Court
