New Delhi: Not one, not two, but three controversial decisions of the third EUMIIR, became the main speaking during the first test between Western India and Australia in Kensington in Bridgetown, Barbados. West Indies won on top of the 2nd, with Australia at 92/4 in its second shifts, which led only 82 runs. The match was interrupted by several controversial calls from the third referee Adrian Holdstock, which influenced both parties in two days.Australia was released at 180 in their first shifts, while Western India corresponded to 190.The chain of the controversy began on the 1st day when Travis Head excluded, despite repetitions indicating that he purely transferred the ball to Shaman’s bowling goal. However, the third referee stated that there was not enough evidence to confirm the clean catch.
Vote
Was the LBW Roston Chase decision justified?
Another dubious moment came on the first day of the day. Despite the clear tip, which appeared before the ball hit the bat, the third referee gave the advantage of doubt for Chase.
Leeds to Birmingham: On the road with Toi Sports
Chase continued to score 44 before he dropped to another questionable decision. He was sentenced to LBW to Pat Cummins, and although he reviewed the decision to quote a visible deviation near the bat, the original verdict was confirmed.“I do not agree with the decision, I do not agree with the technology, I thought it hit, but somehow it worked against Roston Chase,” Ian Bishop commented during the comment.“I’m sorry for the reigning team, in my opinion, which apparently should not be out. I apologize to the officials, but I am in complete disagreement, because he (Chase) is in confusion. You see deflection, change the direction of the ball as he is approaching the bat.The controversy did not stop there. Shai Hope was distributed by Alex Carey, although it seemed that the ball could seem to touch the ground during the catch.Australia is now facing the task of building a solid partnership on the 3rd day to struggle with the match.
