DNA Entertainment Networks pvt. Ltd., the company for managing events, moved the Karnataka High Court on Thursday, which challenged a report submitted by the Investigation Commission for one man on the stadion of M. Chinnaswamy in Bengalur during the victory of the Royal Challengers Bengalur team (RCB).
John Michael Cunha, pensioner of the judge of the Supreme Court in Karnataka, carried out an investigation according to the provisions of the 1952 Co -Act Act on the 1952 conditions and references announced by the State Government and submitted to the government on July 11.
“Biased”
“The Commission seems to have proceeded in a distorted manner, as if it were a commission for searching for failures than for a search commission, and therefore the report is disrupted,” she said in the petition, stressed that a copy of the report was not provided to the petitioner, even if it was escaped to the media.
DNA, which will find several shortcomings in the “hastily” investigative procedure, claimed that the whole investigation process would violate the principles of natural justice and, unlike the provisions of the Coi law of 1952, because no opportunity to investigate that witnesses were not.
“… The rush with which the respondents have carried out the investigation gives the impression that the government wanted to save its skin and that the committee was merely an eye leaf to reassure the general public and blame by producing innocent persons like the petitioner and its officials.
The DNA, which participated in the investigation procedure before the Commission, also claimed that a copy of the imposition of its witnesses and other witnesses, as well as documents that are marked in this respect are not provided in this respect.
The petition was also declared that the Commission did not show personal hearing pursuant to the provisions of the Act before making adverse remarks that could affect the prejudice of any person, despite the application submitted by the DNA representative.
Published – July 24, 2025 20:53
