
Delhi HC has reserved its order for a dose of petitions that stated certain errors in the CLAT UG-2025 questionnaire. File | PHOTO CREDIT: SUDHAKARA JAIN
The High Court in Delhi on Wednesday (April 9, 2025) reserved its order for a dose that stated certain errors in the UG-2025 questionnaire in the admission law test (CLAT).
The divisional bench of the main judge DK UPphyaya and the judiciary Tushar Rao Gedel reserved her order after hearing arguments on the contested issues of lawyers of the petitioners who appeared on the exam in December 2024, and the CNLUS (CNLUS) consortium.
The test of admission of general law (CLAT), 2025, held in December last year, determines admission to university and postgraduate legal courses at National Law Universities in the country.
Meanwhile, the bench set 21 April to hear pleas against certain questions in the Clat PG-2025.
Several lawsuits were filed in the main courts that were incorrect during the test.
On 6 February, the Supreme Court transferred all petitions over this matter to the Delhi High Court for a “consistent decision”.
The Supreme Court approved the direction of the CNLUS transfer petition.
The High Court in Delhi had previously stated that “tension and anxiety” were not good for the candidates and intended to complete the hearing of petitions first to declare the results.
In petitions concerning higher education tests there was urgency and proposals for postgraduate course would start separately, he said.
Several students wanted the cases to be transferred to the Delhi High Court and stated that for some petitioners came a favorable order to identify errors on two issues of the Clat-Ug 2025 test and the consortium to revise their results.
On December 20, 2024, the free judge of the High Court in Delhi ordered a consortium to revise the result of the CLAT-2025 regarding errors in the response key.
The judgment of the only judge who came to the candidate’s candidate decided that the answers to two questions in the entry test were bad.
The application questioned the key of the response published by the consortium 7th December 2024 and at the same time sought a direction that announces the correct answers to certain questions.
The free judge said that the mistakes were “demonstrably clear” and “closed blind eye” would mean injustice.
While the applicant challenged the order of the only judge who refused his prayer over the other two questions, the consortium also shifted the divisional bench of the High Court in Delhi against the decision of the only judge.
On December 24, 2024, the divisional bench refused to pass any interim order after Prima Facia did not find any mistake with the only judge’s regulation on these two questions and stated that the consortium could be declared results in the judge’s decision.
CLAT, 2025, for admission in five -year LLB courses in the NLU took place on December 1 and the results were announced on December 7, 2024.
Published – April 9, 2025 06:47