After the Patiala House court awarded the bail to the accused Gaganpreet Kaur in the event of an accident BMW in Dilli BMW 27.
Rana also claimed that the accused had tried to offer all possible assistance to the injured.
“The bail was awarded to the accused. From the beginning we argued that at least CCTV shots that cover the place of the accident should be submitted to the court. It should be seen in court.”
“In this CCTV shot, it was clear that there was no mistake on the side of the accused Gaganpreeet, which was no mistake at all, because by chance or unintentionally this vehicle collided with the pedestrian path and then collided and joined,” he said.
Rana added: “And when she turned, she touched the motorcycle and accidentally collided with the bus … She tried to provide all possible assistance to the injured. Unfortunately, she participated in this case.” ”
Under the bail conditions, Kaur instructed to give up his passport, participated in all court hearing and avoid any contact with Nulife hospital or witnesses gulfam.
What did the court say?
The court’s decision was influenced by the CCTV shots, suggesting that the incident was nor random and was not caused by ruthless or negligent proceedings. The shots also showed that although the ambulance arrived on the scene immediately, he failed to help victims.
The court strongly criticized the ambulance drivers and rescuers for not giving help, even though they were the first respondents. He asked if their inactivity was medical negligence and urged their behavior to investigate.
Before issuing an order for bail, the Court emphasized that the ambulance reached in seconds and remained only 30 seconds, but transported the injured to the hospital. In particular, the ambulance had no emergency tasks and was on its way to the army basic hospital, the nearest medical facility.
That is why she questioned the police: “What should be done with this ambulance?” Aren’t they charged with the crime of death for negligence? The court later noted that an ambulance who had on board the rescuer was obliged to transport the injured person to the hospital. He noted that although the rescuers asked the passers -by if anyone needed help, the Patial’s court raised concerns about why the best equipped vehicle was present on the scene, but left in just 30 seconds. The court asked if this could be considered medical negligence.
(Tagstotranslate) Delhi BMW accident
