The Keral Waqf (KWB) Council faces a unique call for the restoration of its “organizational respect” and the legal significance and defense of his decision in the case of Munambam as a result of the division of the High Court in Kerala, which smoothes it as land, declaring possession as a WAQF real estate.
The bench consisting of Sushrut ArvinD dharmadhikari and VM Syam Kumar, the second day killed the Council announcement and the registration of Munambam as Waqf as a “act of mere power of grapping”.
The legality of the Bench division will be attacked. The Board of Directors will seek a legal axle to avoid unfavorable comments in the order. The order created a situation where it became impossible for the Board of Directors to fulfill its legal obligation to protect and oversee the features of WAQF, as stated in the WAQF Act.
Even Bona Fide actions of the Board of Directors are now considered suspicion in the fulfillment of their obligations. The consequences of the High Court’s judgment on the WAQF dispute -related disputes are also to be assessed on various court forums, the sources said after the KWB meeting here on Tuesday.
KWB, established under the WAQF law, loses its importance unless observations are legally excluded and attacks the order. The tone and tenor of the Supreme Court criticism apparently gave the impression that the conduct of the Board of Directors could cause hatred and destroyed municipal friendships.
According to sources, the Board of Directors has not been offered the opportunity to submit its views or statements on files concerning the nature of the possession of the possession of the problem, because the legality of the decision of the sole judge was to cancel the appointment of the CN Ramacandran Nair Commission for Munambam.
The meeting decided to seek the legal council from a higher lawyer. The future procedure will be decided after obtaining a legal position, said MK Sakkeer, Chairman of the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors will also mean its objection to the observation of the High Court that ‘if it will be on such an arbitrary statement of WAQF, tomorrow’s random building or structure, of tomorrow, or even this court, or even on the basis of any random documents, based on any building that could be based on any building, tomorrow, random building or structure. a structure that could paint.
These observations without any legal support will cause more damage than any advantage for the parties to the parties, the authorities of the Board of Directors said in response to a court judgment.
Published – October 14, 2025 20:52
