The jury went through a partial judgment against the former Harvey Weinstein film in one of the three accusations of three sex crimes against him. Meanwhile, negotiations on the second accusation will continue, according to AP.
According to the NBC, the jury found that Weinstein was a wine from a first -level crime sexual sexual behavior in terms of Miriam Haley, and not guilty of accusations in connection with the Sokol’s accusations. Meanwhile, there is still an ongoing reasoning concerning the third accusation, the rape of the third degree. The judge ordered the jury to continue the accusation of rape until the court renewed next time.
Followed by the drama of the courtroom, which led to a “partial” verdict
After the lengthy drama of the courtroom, one of the jurors said at a meeting attended by a judge, prosecution and defense that there was a major disruption among the jury members. This problem began after one of the jurors stood firmly at the stand that he “did not change his position”. According to NBC News, the judge said that it seemed that a particular juror would threaten one of his peers, and even allegedly called on a person to “meet him one day”. After hearing about the incident of the judge, he recommended a period of cooling, after which a partial judgment was achieved.
The AP report was: “The judgment divided the peace of justification of its prosecutors and prosecutors – but also Weinstein – in the dominant case. A partial judgment came after an extraordinary day in which the jury presented indicated
“My life is on the line and you know what? It’s not fair,” said former Hollywood hard hitter.
“It’s time, it’s time, it’s time, it’s time to say that this court has ended,” Weinstein continued, as stated by AP.
(Tagstotranslate) Harvey Weinstein
