The police officer stands outside the High Court in Srinagar. File | Photo Credit: Hind
The Ministry of the Interior (MHA) is likely to appeal against the Order of the High Court Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakhu to repair a 63 -year -old housewife who was deported to Pakistan after intervention against the Pakistani state terrorist attack. The government source said the order would soon be questioned at the Higher Court.
According to Hind 23 June, Judge Rahul Bharti ordered the Minister of the Interior of the Union to “acquire” the petitioner Rakshand Rashid of Pakistan, “given the exceptional nature of the facts and circumstances of the case”.
Mrs. Rashid lived in Jammu with her husband and two children over the past 38 years, until April 30, when she was deported to Pakistan via Attari Land’s border point in Pandjab.
Her family moved the High Court, who ordered June 6 to bring back in 10 days.
Ankur Sharma, the petitioner’s advisor, told the Hindi command that the command could be attacked in front of the High Court’s divisional bench, and were ready to object.
“We understand that if the order is attacked by the Union’s government, we can also object, so whenever the case appears on hearing, we will also receive a notice of submitting our case,” said Mr. Sharma.
As mentioned, the petitioner lives in a hotel in Lahore with little money because she has no immediate family members in Pakistan. Her daughter said that Mrs. Rashid was in India on a long -term visa (LTV) and in 1996 she asked for citizenship that had never been processed.
After April 22, Pahalgam’s terrorist attack, where 26 people were killed, MHA canceled the visas of all Pakistani citizens and asked them to leave the country by April 29. Although the order liberated those with LTV or Pakistani women, married to Indian citizens, Mrs. Rashid said and captured her lawyer.
Judge Bharti noted in his order: “Human rights are the most sacred part of human life, and therefore there are cases where the Constitutional Court is to come up with devotion similar to SOS, regardless of merit and shortcomings that can be decided to return to sexual sexual sexual sexual sexual sexual sex She returned to the government to return to the government to return to the government to return to the government to return to the government to return to the government to return to the government to return to the government from her sexual point of view from her sexual point of view. deportation.
Published – June 24, 2025 22:48
