
A viral reel on Instagram caused a hard debate after showing a woman using AI tool during a live work interview and feeding his answers in real time to the questions that the interviewer at Google Meet. The reel, who shares an IntervietSidekick page, appears to be a marketing video for AI interview assistant.
In the video, a woman sits in front of her laptop and visibly participates in an online interview while keeping her phone in front of her. The phone, as the headline explains, displays the responses generated in real time with the AI tool that listens to the conversation and the questions asked by the interviewer and immediately suggests answers – allows the user to read them loudly as his own.
The reel is marked from the perspective of her husband:
“During her conversation, I captured my wife using AI for highly paid technical work … and honestly, it may be a genius. This instrument has provided its real-time answers, immediate feedback and confidence that it crushes her job interview-needs a last minute when you have AI in your corner AI?”
Although it was intended to demonstrate the ability of the tool, the video drew immediate resistance in the comment section. Instagram users flooded the post with sharp criticism and called it deceptive and unethical.
One user whose husband works in hiring, commented:
“My husband takes conversations and I know it doesn’t work! The expression, eyes and your answers say everything … confidence in the face when answering … delay, etc. !! (The interviewer is not stupid)
“Why people can’t use their brains and get a job with their own talent? Can I anticipate that bharat in the hands of these people is not safe.” (Sic.)
The third user repeated sentiment:
“You can cheat once, twice, three times, but not always. At least be faithful to where you earn bread and butter. Stop spreading bad things
The winch stimulated the ongoing debate on the growing role of AI in applications and assessment of jobs. While the AI has already been widely accepted in tasks such as writing CV and skills evaluation, AI use in real time during live online conversations raised serious concerns about authenticity, hiring integrity and long -term impact on the workplace culture.
Since the video continues to circulate, critics say that promoting such tools not only supports dishonesty, but could also undermine the processes of great hiring to which they try to navigate. Meanwhile, it seems that interviewekick uses viral attention to raise awareness of its product – despite growing criticism.
(Tagstotranslate) AI Tool