BIHAR voter list line: Today, the Supreme Court will hear a dose of petitions that question the Electoral Commission for the Indian Special Intensive Revision (Sir) of election roles in a Bihar survey.
The SC bench, which includes the judges of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi, has more than 10 related matters, including the release of Sir, listed for hearing on July
Also read Pappu Yadav denied a place on Rahul’s van? Purnia MP says, “Be offended …”
9.
Activists said the exercise undermined the principles of free and righteous elections and representative democracy, both integral features of the basic structure of the Constitution, the introduction of arbitrary, inadequate and disproportionate documentation requirements related to birth, stay and citizenship.
In addition, Lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay filed a separate reasoning reason that supports this step and sought direction into the vote panel to make Sir to ensure that only Indian citizens decide on politics and policy, not unlawful foreign infiltrators. ”
Also read | People in Bihar enthusiastically participated in the revision of voters: CEC
Demography of 200 districts and 1,500 then changed independence due to massive illegal infiltration, deceptive religious transformation and explosion of the population. Demography is fate and dozens of districts have already seen that their fate was formed by those who are not Indians, ”he said.
On July 7, the bench was reported by lawyers led by the leading advisor Kapil Sibal, who represented several petitioners and agreed to hear the request of the 10th July.
Sibal, who represents MEP RJD Manoj Jha, urged the bench to issue a notification panel of the survey in petitions and call it a “impossible task” within the timeline, because the state would take place in November.
Senior advocate Abhishek M Singhvi, who appeared for another petitioner, said about eight voters in the state, four voters Crore would have to present their documents under exercise.
“The timeline is so strict, and if you present documents by July 25, you will be out,” Singhvi added.
The leader of the advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, who appeared for another petitioner, said that the vote panel does not accept the Aadhaar card and the identification cards of voters as evidence of exercise.
Also read | Bihar Voter List Revision Line: Mahua Moita claims that EC targets Bengal’s next
The justice of Dhulia, who published a matter of 10 July, said the timeline has not currently been sanctified because the elections have not yet been announced. The bench asked the petitioner to overtake their proposals by representatives of the Legal Commission of the Indian Election Commission.
One of the petitioners is the election association for democratic reforms (ADR).
The fundamental right to life and freedom
In addition to RJD MP Jha and Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, Congress KC Venugopal, Supriya Sule from Sharad Parwar NCP Fraction, D Raja from the Communist Party of India, Harinder Singh Malik from Samajwadi, Arvind Shiv Shiv Sena Malik, Saarian ahuth. Morcha and Dipankar Bhattacharya of CPI (ml) moved together the Supreme Court.
All leaders questioned the command of the Electoral Commission, which directed for Sir election roles in Bihar and was looking for a direction for his cancellation.
JHA, in his action brought through the defense counsel Fauzia Shakil, claims that the EC 24. June order should be canceled for violations of Articles 14 (fundamental right to equality), 21 (fundamental right to life and freedom), 325 (no person may be excluded from electoral certificates, religion and sex) voter) constitutions.
Also read | Half Bihar could lose voting rights for Sir EC: Adr’s Jagdeep Chhokar
“The contested order sets out a schedule and requires the list of enumeration within 30 days, followed by submission of applications and objections and their disposal within 30 days,” said the action.
Moitra was looking for a direction from the top court to limit the EC in issuing similar orders for the Sir of Electoral roles in other countries of the country.
Exercise Election Commission
Exercise Sir in a survey, which began in Bihar 25th June, caused a political storm. The opposition Congress called him an “attempt to equipment” organized by the Election Commission on the basis of the instructions of the ruling regime. At least half a dozen petitions of political parties, individuals and groups of civil society were filed at the Supreme Court against what they call “obviously unconstitutional” exercises.
The contested order sets out a schedule and requires the list of list within 30 days, followed by submission of applications and objections and their disposal within 30 days.
The opposition leaders, including the leader of the Rahula Gandhi Congress, RJD’s Tejashwi Yadav, and several other Indian blocs led the march to the Office of the Election Commission in Patna in protest.
The survey panel stated that the aim of the amplified revision is to ensure that the names of all eligible citizens are included in the election role to allow them to authorize their permission that no incapable voter is included in the election role and that complete transparency in the processing or removal of voters is introduced.
(Tagstotranslate) Supreme Court (T) Indian Election Commission (T) Electoral roles
