In the Supreme Court, many petitions questioning Sir in Bihar were filed. File | Photo Credit: Neither
Judge’s bench judges of Sudhansh Dhulia and Joylyia Bagchi are scheduled for July 10 to hear the arguments for and against the special intensive revision (SIR) of the electoral role in Bihar and decide whether the drive, initiated by the Election Commission of India, must remain.
More than 10 petitions filed by opposition, activists, non -governmental organizations and lawyers, who agreed on the urgent statement of the case on July 10, were mentioned before the bench.
Keep it simple: about a special intense revision of the Bihar election roles
The petitions listed on hearing and challenge Sir are those that Trinamool Congress MEP Mahu Moitr, leader of the KC Venugopal, Rashtriya Janata, gave MP Manoi Jha, activists Yogendra Yadav, Arshad Ajmal, Ngos Association for Democratic Reforms and People’s Union. The court also stated a petition filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay supporting Sir.
The petitions claimed that the provisional order from the top court remaining a announcement of June 24, who announced that Sir was necessary because Crores voters drawn from poor and marginalized parts of society were submitted to a close guide to present documents showing their residence or facing prospects.
The petitioners stated that the last date for submitting the list forms was 25 July. The names of the applicants would be published in the proposal of the election role of 1 August 2025 unless the forms were submitted in time.
The petitioners stated that the election commission must be made to explain the justification of the “poorly timed and hasty” way of performing the Sir in Bihar. Mr. Jha claimed that the decision was taken by the vote body without prior consultation with political parties and would be employed to “justify aggressive and opaque revisions of electoral roles that disproportionately targeted to Muslim, Dalit and poor communities of migrants”.
The petitioners argued that the SIR process violated the provisions of the 1950s Act and Rules 21A of the 1960 voters’ registration.
On the other hand, Mr. Upiphyay voted for the periodic behavior of electoral roles across the country.
“Demography of 200 districts and 1,500 then has changed independence due to massive illegal infiltration, deceptive religious transformations and population explosions. Demography is fate, and dozens of districts have already seen their fate, that it is their destiny, that it is, that it is that it It is that it is, that it is, that it is, that it is, that it is, that it is a candidate to devote himself to the assembly and local elections.
Published – 9 July 2025 20:01 IS IS
