View of the Indian court in Nový Delhi. | Photo Credit: Neither
On Thursday (May 29, 2025), the Supreme Court stiffened its order 22 May, which directed the state of Karnataka to release portable rights to development (TDR) by more than 3,000 GBP Crore for 15 hectares and 17.5 Guntas Bangalore Palace Ground, obtained on Ballari and Jayamahal Road, to Ernrnsking Roly.
The special bench of the three judges headed by Judge Surya Kant ordered that the TDR certificate must remain in the Supreme Court register.
When he was informed that the certificate had already been handed over to the applicants, the Supreme Court took interim measures to add that TDR, if one was handed over, must not be transferred to third parties or any way in any way use in any way.
The court ordered a proposal for a review filed by the state against the order of 22 May, which is to be sent for hearing in the week, which begins on 21 July.
“If the review petition is reduced, temporary instructions will continue to be valid for four weeks from the date of admission of such an order,” the bench ordered.
He published the main appeal for the Bangalore Palace premises and for hearing 18 August.
May 27. The divisional bench of judges Kant and Dipankar Datta filed for the request of the State of Karnataka against the order of 22.
The leader of Mukul Rohathgi and advocate T. Harish Kumar for legal heirs described the use of the state as mere abuse of the law.
Mr. Sibal, however, asked how TDRS worth 3,011,66 GBP could be released for soil measurement, which measures over 15 hectares, when the main appeal is questioned by gaining a larger extent of 472 acres according to the Bangalore law (acquisition and transfer) of 1996.
He asked whether the direction of the state could be handed over in a parallel proceedings on contempt to fire nearly 3,011.66 Crore for valuable TDR for land when the Bangalore Palace (Acquisition and Transfer) of 1996 set the amount of RS. 11 crore as a compensation for a full range of 472 acres.
The head of the lawyer claimed that the Supreme Court committed a mistake in its order on May 22, in the application of the procedure for the payment of compensation pursuant to Section 14b of the Karnataka Planning Act of 1961.
The head of the lawyer asked whether the provisions introduced into the KTCP law in 2004 could be retrospectively used to abolish the 1996 acquisition.
Published – 29. May 2025 21:52 is
