“Our court action asks the court to block the executive order in effect because it exceeds the power granted to the President and would cause considerable damage. Our legal system is designed to precisely prevent such an overlap,” said Kalpana V. Peddibhl, Executive Director of South Asian Justice (Saajco).
This was the first main case filed against the Executive Order of Trump, which tried to limit the entry of foreigners in the country, as well as the backward lawmakers in the US, who have increased the H-1B visa in the last two months.
“We believe that the law is crystal clear, which does not allow any president to do what Trump did here,” said Charles H. Kuck, founder of a legal company based in Atlanta, in an e-mail response to the Ming. Kuck is also a professor of law to Emory University School of Law, where he teaches advanced immigration rights.
Peddibhotla said that Trump had passed the order by damaging the US economy.
“By saving a fee of $ 100,000, it changes (executive order) a legal visa program for playing for playing, which benefits only the richest employers and damages the wider US economy. The language of fraud and stolen employment has long been used to justify immigrants from Latin America and Africa and Africa and Africa. “Africa”, they said “they said”, they said “”, “they said,” they said “, they said” “, they said” “. Peddibhotla.
According to the US Foreign Ministry, Asian countries are the primary recipients of H-1B visas. The best recipient was India, who received 150,647 visas in the previous fiscal year. China was far away and received such a visa of 31 735.
TRUMPA CHEST
On September 23, at least nine complainants, including trade unions from sectors such as health, education, agriculture, cars and aviation, were filed through seven law firms at the California District Court. They attacked Trump’s order and asked the court to consider the unlawful statement and to be processed by H-1B visas in accordance with existing laws.
Legal companies and non -profit organizations include Justice Action Center, Democracy Forward Foundation, Kuck Baxter LLC, South Asian American Justice Collaborative, Joseph & Hall, PC, Bless Litigation LLC and Siskind Susser.
They represent nine complainants, including Global Nurse Force, California’s medical business, which provides nurses to hospitals throughout the US and various trade unions and religious organs.
“The H1-B dispute is not the one you would expect to find the cooperation-united auto workers and the nursing group united as part of the group looking for relief against the Trump H1-B fee. It shows how opposition to Trump creates unusual allies,” said Russell A. Stamets reaction to Mind.
However, Peddibhotla said, “It is too soon to speculate on other steps, but we are ready to continue every legal way necessary to protect people and communities that will affect this policy. We are convinced of our case and believe that the law is on our part at all levels of review.”
Kuck added that they would appeal to a higher court if they lost this case: “Like the government when they lose.”
In the US, parties dissatisfied with the decision of the District Court may appeal to one of the 13 district courts known as the US Court of Appeal. If one of the parties still dissatisfied with the judgment of the district courts, the Supreme Court may ask for this case to hear.
The Supreme Court will review the petition and comply with the application only if it believes that a significant legal problem needs to be resolved. If the petition is rejected by the Supreme Court, the lower court decision remains final and binding.
“As a court order issued against Trump’s use of soldiers in Oregon, lower courts usually rule against Trump, but Trump wins to appeal at the Supreme Court, which has completely given up his independence to Trump,” Stamets said.
Mounting visa
According to the coin analysis, most H-1B visas are affected by Information Technology (IT), and Indians are mostly such visa holders. Seven out of the 10 largest users of these visas are technology companies. According to data from US civil and immigration services, the top 10 users were 36,737 visas, which is more than half of the total number of H-1B visas issued in 2024-25, from June 30. The US government monitors the fiscal calendar from October to September.
American creators of politicians also increased the control of these visa holders.
On September 30, Tom Cotton, a Republican Senator of Arkansas, introduced the Visa enforcement Act in the US Senate aimed at getting rid of universities, non-profit organizations and research institutes of their long-term liberation from the H-1B annual visa.
Almost a week ago, September 24, Republican Senator Charles E. Grassley and democratic senator Richard J. Durbin aimed several companies, including TCS and Cognizant, over their hiring.
Both senators wrote common letters K. Crithivasan and S. Ravi Kumar, manager of TCS and Cognizant workers and sought answers to the demand for discrimination based on race and replaced US workers with low costs H-1B employees.
At the beginning of the same month, Senator Ohio Bernie Moreno proposed the Act on International Moving Employees (Rental) Stopting to Raise Taxes on Society, hiring Offshore employees from their IT dealers.
(Tagstotranslate) H-1B visa
