Carlos Alcaraz and Rafa Nadal (photo Carlos Alvarez/Getty Images for Laureus) Unlike his idol, Alcaraz at the age of 22 gained major grass, hard and clay. Nadal’s first 4 victories of slam came in Paris From the first day it was spoken, but Sunday night was the perfect catalyst for the tennis world to go to Tizza. At the age of 22, Rafael won five Grand Slam titles, and when Carlos Alcaraz did the same by surviving Jannik Sinner in Rafa ‘Home’ Roland Garros, comparison calls became louder.Go beyond the border with our YouTube channel. Subscribe!“It’s a hundred
Both are the Spaniards, both share a non -sticker attitude, both are Real Madrid fans. There are many similarities between them. So much that loyalist Rafa for decades and a half feels that Alcaraz is a natural heir to his throne of the heart.
Vote
Which player’s style do you prefer?
But is it so simple? Are Nadal and Alcaraz cut out of the same fabric? The answer is probably “no”.Nadal came at a time when the world was in respect of Roger Federer’s beauty with a decrease in jaws. The victory became a routine when this Spanish matador swung the Citadel of Tennis with an incredible ability to endure. Federer, who grew up on the Swiss clay and believed by 2005 that it was a matter of time before the French won, suddenly did not know how to get around his young Nemesis on the red clay in Paris. It was a puzzle that Federer had never solved – defeated Rafa on other surfaces, but never on Roland Garros.Who is the IPL player?Nadal won 14 French Open titles – a record that is unlikely to be broken – and that had a lot in common with different aspects of his game that continued to add his basic repertoire that he was an incredible retriever. But start, the myth of Rafa began as a counterpoint to the elegance of Federer.This is a fundamental difference between Alcaraz and Nadal. Murica the boy appeared on the big stage almost like the Savior at the beginning of 2022, when Federer was gone, Nadal was in decline and Novak Djokovic was an inviolable master. Tennis was slightly unidimensional and needed the golden dust of artistic dust to be tempting for consumers to pamper the Swiss Spanish royal rank for almost two decades.“The basic difference between Nadal and Alcaraz is that the other is as good on any surface as it is on clay. His first slamning came to the hard courts of the US. He learned grass when no one expected him, and now it is double French open champion.
Bombay Sport Exchange Ep. 6: Harish Thawani on a cricket television market and the moments of the river basin
While Nadal became an extremely reliable Volyer and still added new shots and aspects to his game, the main force of the winner 22 was his ability to defend on a slightly slower surface. Alcaraz, on the other hand, even as a teenager, was a combination of attack and defense – his ability to play the outrageous winner was the cornerstone of some of his best moments so far. Whether its drop shot down 0-30 for match against Novaku Djokovic in 2023 Wimbledon Final or its ability to pull the winner from the bag on Sunday in the last set Tiebreak, Alcaraz was Federer more than Nadal for tennis tragic.The biggest compliment for Alcaraz probably came from the second Master Djokovich, who feels that after the final loss of Wimbledon “he did not play players like him”. “Roger and Rafa had their own strengths and weaknesses, but Carlos is a wonderful player. I would say his game has the best of all three.”This probably summarizes Alcaraz’s game. And when John McEnroe said on Sunday that “these boys (Alcaraz and Sinner) would beat Roger and Rafa in their main first -class”, did you leave with the dilemma: “Who would you pay for watching? Nadal or Alcaraz?Krishhnan smiled at the question. “I will probably pay for tracking both.”
