After several rounds of lawsuits in the last 10 years, the High Court in Carnation has now confirmed the conduct of soaps and detergents of Karnataka LTD (KSDL) at the release of an employee who ensured the work of hiding the fact that he was released from his previous employer.
KSDL was named BR Cheluvaraj (47) as a junior officer (production and maintenance) in June 2014.
Later, after verifying his predecessors by the police, KSDL learned that he was released from Raithar Vyvayothpann Maraata Sahakar Sangha Niyamith, Mandy, his former employer in 2011, and his former employer, and the criminal case against him in 2010 was registered against him in 2010.
After receiving a report on the police verification, KSDL rejected him in January 2015 because he did not publish the fact that he was rejected from the service because the condition for appointment that applicants should not be rejected from the service.
However, Mr. Cheluvaraj challenged his release KSDL at the High Court, which canceled the termination and ordered the KSDL to take steps against him after a proper investigation.
Then the KSDL appointed an investigative official who found out in 2016 that the accusation against him was not established because Mr. Cheluvaraju was not labeled YES or not for the question of release from the previous employer.
However, the CEO of the KSDL ordered a new investigation through the judge of the district and retirement session. Mr. Cheluvaraj questioned a new investigation at the High Court, which found in 2018 that the initiation of fresh investigation set up a mistake without framing fresh fees.
Then KDSL framed fresh accusations against him and entrusted a new investigation into the retirement and the judge of the meeting, who in April 2019 reported that he had been shown against him and KSDL in May 2019 ended it from service.
Mr. Cheluvaraj questioned his termination again before the High Court and the only judge of the court in February 2025 confirmed his termination for hiding information about release from the service by an earlier employer and filed an appeal against this judgment from the division bench.
The divisional bench, including the chief judge of Vibha Bakhra and the judiciary Ramacandra D. Huddar confirmed its termination in its sentence on August 13 and stressed that it was mandatory to publish in its application that it was rejected from service.
Published – August 19, 2025 22:46
