The National Herald: Delhi court has reserved his order to know the indictment of coercive supervision (ED) in the case of the National Herald Money money laundering against the former Presidents of the Sonia Congress and Rahul Gandhi
They are between seven accused in this case. In addition to Gandhis, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, young Indian, dottex goods and Sunil Bhandari were designed as accused ED.
The order will now be announced on July 29, according to a special judge (PC) Vishal Gogne of Rouse Avenue Court.
The Court of Justice has heard arguments from the Council of ED and accused from 2 July on a daily basis.
What’s that?
The National Herald case stems from the private complaint of former Minister of Union Subraminian Swamy, accusing Sonii Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Motilalal Vora, Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitrod and Gandhi’s family -controlled Indian, criminal conspiracy and trustworthy.
Doctoral doctorates filed their accusations against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi and others according to Section 3 (money washing) and 4 (penalty punishment) of the Act on Money washing Act (PMLA).
The indictment also applies Suman Dudey, Sam Pitroda, Sunil Bhandari, Young Indian and DotEx Merchandise Private Limited. All the accusations opposed Ed’s plea about the knowledge of the indictment and denied the accusations.
Ed claimed that Gandhis held most of the 76 % shares in Young Indian, who fraudulently usurp assets Associated Journals Limited (AJL), in exchange for A £90 CRORE Loan, the PTI press agency reported.
“The whole India Congress Committee (AICC) has received funds that were to be used correctly but the way they used £90 Crore (shows) committed a crime of confidence, ”argued the next general lawyer of St. Raja.
“Transacation between AJL and young Indian was a false transaction,” he added.
The federal agency also accused Sonii and Rahul Gandhi, the leaders of the late Congress Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, as well £2,000 crore belonging to Ajl, published by National Herald.
Gandhis defends himself
However, Gandhis claimed that this was a “strange” and unprecedented case where accusations of money laundering were made without using or projection of property.
During the hearing of Congress leader, Ed’s accusation refuted that the young Indian was accustomed to usurping asset assets in exchange for a loan. “The loan was supposed to do without debt,” they said.
(Tagstotranslate) National Case Herald (T) Money Washing Case (T)
