Looking at the Supreme Court in Kareni. | Photographic credit:
The Karnataka High Court imposed the chairman and members of the Hassan District Caste Caste Caste Castued, which was selected for government work from the pillar for a year, and refused them, unlike the law, and unlike the law, and unlike the law.
“This is a case where the members of the committee must be met by exemplary costs. The chairman and members who deliberately ignore the law, as a result, the petitioner is led to unnecessary court dispute and subsequent loss of 12 months of employment,” said the court.
M. Nagaprasann’s justice approved the order and at the same time allowed the petition to be filed by Muthlakshm Bn of Channaayapatna in the Hassan district.
The petitioner was selected as an assistant to the prosecutor in category 3a in January 2023 and was asked to record pictures of all its original certificates on the government portal in May 2023 in May 2023.
However, the Committee, headed by the representative of the Hassan district, refused to verify its direct certificate of obtaining a report from a verification clerk who stated that her husband’s income exceeds the limit.
Then the petitioner moved from the pillar to the contribution and approached various state authorities and stressed that the income certificate is based on the income of her father and not on the income of her husband by law, which was the courts settled. In March 2024, she finally knocked down the door of the High Court and questioned the committee’s conduct.
When the court in April 2024 questioned the committee’s conduct for not taking into account the father’s income under the law stipulated by the top court, the committee issued a certificate of validity with the note that “validity certificates are issued only on the basis of the court, even if her husband’s income exceeds the limit”.
The Court, which described the Committee’s notes as “not only the ignorance of the law, as settled by the peak but also the court,” he said that “the unlawful act of the committee made the petitioner disappear into an anxiety limbo for 12 months when other selected candidates proceeded” back in June 2024.
The Court of Justice ordered the then chairman and members of the committee the cost of 2 lakh from their personal fund.
Published – 9 July 2025 9:02
