The Central Council for Film Certification (CBFC) reported that it is against the character named “Janaki” (another name for the goddess SITA), which is exposed to rape and is also aggressively reviewed by a lawyer from another religion that is for negligence because it is for negligence This is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is done-because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is because it is. Review —- does not delight, which is not on the basis of the fact that it is because it is not possible to take place. Janaki vs state of kerala.
The honorary statement of the Board of Directors says that a petition filed by the Film Production Society does not recognize that films are rated in its entirety than in isolation. Also, he does not understand that the right to freedom of expression and manifestation pursuant to Article 19 of the Constitution is not absolute and is subject to adequate restrictions.
The certification process therefore represents a careful balance between creative freedom and regulatory supervision. The title and the main character of the film are of religious connotation and will tend to cause a public disorder because they are named after the goddess Janaki (SITA), which has a deep religious significance in Ramayana.
The Board of Directors justified the demand of CBFC for the change in the name and claimed that the character Janaki in the film was shown as rape survivors. In addition, the permission of such films for a public exhibition would create a dangerous precedent and opened the Pandor box for future production. This would undermine religious feelings across communities and represent a serious threat to public order.
Meanwhile, the production company of the film agreed to change the name “Janaki” in the film as “Janaki V”, in adherence to the CBFC proposal, because the full name is Janaki Vidyadharan. The film would be again again as Janaki V. vs State of Keraral. She also agreed to either reduce the reference to the name “Janaki” or chose an alternative name in two cases in the film.
CBFC said it would issue a certificate of censors within three days of a producer company to present the film in its revised form. The bench of justice N. Nagaresh published a case for hearing on July 16.
JUSTICE NAGARESH watched the film, on Saturday as Minister of Union Suresh Gopi, on the basis of Cosmos Entertainments, a production company of the film.
Published – 9 July 2025 20:11 is
