On Thursday, July 10, the Supreme Court will listen to several petitions that question the Election Commission for the Indian Special Intensive Revision (Sir) of Electoral roles in Bihar. The court accepted the petitioners’ request for urgent hearing in this matter, but refused to suspend this exercise.
The controversy about the revision of the voters in Bihar has been intensified in the last few days when the Congress of the Trinamool Mahua, RJD’s Manoi Jha, the Association of Watchdog for Democratic Reform (ADR), assessed that the People’s Union for Civil Freedom and the activist Yadav moves it. Election Commission.
Also read | Bihar Voter List Revision Line: Mahua Moita claims that EC targets Bengal’s next
In his petition, ADR claims that the ECI command is arbitrary and could potentially get rid of millions of voters.
The leaders of the chapels of chapels Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Gopal Sankaranarayanan and Shadan Farasat together mentioned the matter before partial working days of benches, which includes the justice of Sudhanshu Dhulia and justice Joylyma Bagchi.
EC clarification on sir
On Sunday, the Election Commission (EC) issued a statement that clarified that it had not changed its instructions on the revision process, after several contributions to the social media, including one President of the Mallikarjun Kharge Congress, quoted an advertisement published in the newspaper to indicate that the document was not necessary.
Congress and other parties of India block the provisions where voters whose names were included in the election role after 2003, to submit documents related to birth.
“Why are the people who voted after the elections after the elections asked to show their documents for the vote?” Kharge said in a post on X.
Also read | ADR moves the Supreme Court against the revision of ECI Bihar Voter Roll
In his statement, the Election Commission explained that while voters were obliged to “submit their documents at any time before 25th July 2025”, those who did not do so would get the opportunity “during the period of claims and objections”.
EC also urged people to “pay attention to several people who, without reading the Sir Order of June 24, 2025 …. try to confuse the public with their incorrect and misleading statements”.
The leader of the Congress Trinamool Mahua Moitr, who moved the Top Court, which sought to cancel the ES 24th June order, according to which a special intensive revision (SIR) is carried out that it violates several provisions of the Constitution and the 1950s (RP) Act.
If this is not canceled, this may lead to extensive release of eligible voters in the country, undermining democracy and free and fair elections, its request has been submitted.
Also read | RJD challenges the revision of the Bihar voter voters in SC, “the initial phase,” says EC
“The Present Writ Petition Has Been Filed in Public Interest Under Article 32 of the Constitation Seeking Setting Aside of Order Datad 24.06.2025 ISSUED BY ELECTION Commission of India Under Which Sir of Electoral Rolls in Bihar Is Being Conducted In -Element of Articles 14, 19 (1) (A) 21, 325, 328 of the Constitution and Provisions of the Representation of People (RP) Act, 1950 and Registration of Electors (RER) Rules, 1960 …, ”said Předba.
Moitra was also looking for a direction from the top court to limit the election commission to issue similar orders for Sir election roles in other countries of the country.
According to the EC, exercise was necessary by rapid urbanization, frequent migration, young citizens became capable of voting, non -sight of death and include the names of foreign illegal immigrants.
The vote panel said it wanted to ensure the integrity and preparation of flawless electoral election valves.
(Tagstotranslate) Supreme Court (T) July 10
