In the case of the Supreme Court in the SUO Moto, the state government issued orders on Friday and reconstructed the expert committee to identify forested land in the state on Friday.
With a smaller number of persons than the previous previous, the new 7-member committee is chaired by another main main conservator of forests responsible for IT and nature conservation and includes a person nominated by the main commissioner of the Land Administration and a representative from the National Agency for remote survey as members, forest officer and officer and member. Madhava Rao, Radon Rao. The main conservator/conservator of the forest, Rajanna Sircilla Circle and district forest officer Khammam as members/field forest officers.
The previous committee had a wider membership of higher bureaucrats such as CCLA, Commissioner GHMC, Metropolitan Commissioner HMDA, Commissioner Panchayat Raj, Director, City and Country, Commissioner for the Section, Commissioner for Agriculture, Commissioner/Commissioner, Members and Managers and Head of Members and Members.
Membership in the Committee gained a serious opinion from the Top Court, which challenged the representation of so many unrelated departments in the committee to identify forests. The Central Empowered Committee, which submitted its report on Kancha Gachibowli, also recommended the reconstruction of the panel with the representation of the relevant departments.
The Supreme Court was ordered by a state -level expert at the state level for the identification of forest land in the dominant judgment of Godavarman Thirumulpad in 1996, which expanded the definition of forest to its verbal meaning from a close interpretation based on legal boundaries or ownership.
Several government governments did not build professional committees or exercises to identify the considered forests. Given that the central government removed unclassified forests from the legal definition of forests by a recent amendment to the Forest Protection Act of 1980, the Supreme Court filed a litigation of public interest and provoked the judgment of Goduvarman Thirumulpad.
The Supreme Court ordered the State Government and the territory of trade unions to transmit records of reports of their professional committees, which contained data on the forests considered to the Ministry of the Environment, Forests and Climate Change, and now all states are provoking professional committees.
The state government issued its first order, which was March 15 this year, presented by the previous expert for an expert, with one month, which will come up with the news. The latest order does not determine any time limit for the message.
Published – 27th June 2025 21:38
