‘Pooovai’ M. Jagan Moorthy | Photo credit: x / @jaganmoorty_m
The criminal investigation (CB-CID) department, Friday (June 27, 2025), accused Kilvaithinakuppam (reserved) “Pooovai” M. Jagan Moorthy that the agency was not cooperated with the fact that it had to be subject to be subject to care.
Another General Attorney General (AAG) J. Ravindran, who appeared before the justice of G. Jayacandran, said the MLA issued the evasive answers to the Police Thiruvallangadu during the investigation conducted with him on June 17th. Mr. Ravindran claimed that the legislature would only speak if he was arrested and subjected to the screening. He called on the court to reject the petition of a predictive deposit of the MLA.
The judge decided to pass the orders for an action for a preliminary bail during the day after hearing the heated arguments between AAG and the leader of the S. Prabakaran representing the MLA. The head of the attorney initiated the arguments on behalf of the petitioner, the Thiruvallangada police registered the first information report (Fir) 7 June on the basis of a complaint filed by a woman named Lakshmi.
According to criminal prosecution, the older son of the complainant fell in love with the Theni district, according to their acquaintance through social media and made it with her on April 15 with marriage with her self -confidence. The bride’s father Vanaraja entered a criminal conspiracy with the MLA and the next CEO of the police (ADGP) to find out that he was writing in writing.
In accordance with the conspiracy of the gang, he kidnapped the younger son of the complainant from her residence during the hours of Wee 7 June. However, when the police intensified the search for her complaint, the youth were dropped near the bus stand in the perambakamam, within a few hours after the kidnapping, in the official ADGP car to escape the police search.
The introduction of the company was changed on the basis of the arrest of five individuals involved in the kidnapping and that it was based on a confession that gave two of them that the MLA was involved, stated that there were no other materials indicating its involvement in the crime but for religion that cannot be relying during negotiations.
“Mla, the brain for a crime”
On the other hand, AAG claimed that the had the brain for the whole crime and asked the court to refuse his pre -bail by considering the need to decrimine policy. The law officer presented the Screenshots CCTV shots from the hotel, where the plot was hatched and said that there were records of telephone calls in addition to the recovery of 7.86 Lakh from Vanaraja.
“When we asked about ADGP,” X “gave the reason he spoke to the MLA by phone, but when we asked the MLA,” y “gave the reason he spoke to ADGP. This contradiction itself shows that it is involved in a crime. The investigation is in the nascent phase, because it is only three days when the case was transferred to CB-CB, ”said AAG. He said the court that the police would take steps against ADGP.
However, Mr. Prabakaran said that the money was not obtained from the MLA and was already under investigation throughout the day of June 17th. He made sure that the court was willing to participate in the past in the past.
Published – 27th June 2025 01:44
