Thousands of migrant workers in the UK, including the Indians, were left stuck after the medical and care visa was taken over and took over, for what was perceived as a means of developing employment in the middle of the increase in demand.
Here is everything you need to know about the fraud of visa in the field of health and care worker and how the government solves it.
1. What is the health and care visa in the UK?
The health and health visa presented by the UK Government has enabled medical experts to come or stay in the UK to perform eligible work with the NHS, NHS supplier or in social care for adults. The visa was supposed to take five years for the applicants to apply for an extension.
2. When and why was the health and care visa introduced?
Boris Johnson’s Government in 2020 was introduced by medical and nursing visas, because the number of vacancies in the social care sector-KTERý takes care of older, sick and disabled people due to COVID-19, Brexit and aging population. Employers were given a quick route to recruit employees from abroad for licenses from the home office for sponsorship staff.
3. What is a fraud in health and care visa?
However, as a result of several checks made by employers approved for the offer of sponsorship, there was soon a large fraud in reports that companies were charging a heal amount of money from applicants, which was illegal within this system. Moreover, many employers paid too little to their workers, overwhelmed them or had no hours at all. Workers were afraid to report their employers because their right to stay was directly tied to their employment at this workplace.
4. How does the British government struggle with this problem?
After inspection, British visas and immigration (moles), they began to investigate and cancel at least 471 employers’ sponsorship licenses. However, this meant that more than 40,000 migrant employees could no longer work, leave them in limbo and look for an alternative employer. The UK Government Initiative, which would correspond to these exploited employees of care for migrating employers, helped less than 4 % to find jobs, as applicable to freedom of information, Bloomberg informed.
According to data published by Home Office in response to FOI of charity rights that were tied to their employers, it had to be referred to by government “hubs” from the Charity Center of Working Rights. However, the data showed that only 941 or 3.4 % of workers said they found an alternative job.
5. What will be next?
E -maly sent to the displaced workers inviting them to visit their local recruitment center, according to one government source mentioned by Bloomberg in many cases. Many of them are assumed that, according to another government official, the so -called “black market” work, such as prostitution, has caused themselves to make a living. In other cases, employers have rejected workers who apply through the hub because their English language is not satisfactory or other requirements fail.
(Tagstotranslate) Health and nursing visa
