Follow Disable catches Bunny Hop Which entered into force in the international cricket in June, there are several rules that have been changed in cricket international men. Some have already been incorporated into the ongoing edition of the Test World Championship, which began earlier in June. There are also several new rules for one -day international and Twenty20 International, which will come into effect from the first of June.
From the stops in the test cricket to the replacement players for visibly injured in one -day internationalists, the ICC reported a member association on changes in the rules, according to ESPNCRICINFO. Most of them are to come into force to solve practical problems that have been raised in the recent past. While the ban on saliva remains even after the Indian Premier League lifted it, the ICC has now not done so that the arbitrators change the ball as soon as they noticed saliva. More about it below.
Stop a clock in a test cricket
In order to solve long -term delays between exceeding, resulting in poor excessive speed, the ICC has brought a stop of the clock to test the cricket after its success in the formats of the white ball.
What will change
* Fielding team must be ready to start another over 60 seconds of the previous end.
* Teams get two warnings about delay.
* The referee will impose a punishment on the bowling side of the five-run.
* Warning reset every 80 overs – when second and subsequent new balls are available for bowling teams.
* The rule is already active in cycle 2025-27 WTC.
Improvement of Saliva Government
ICC has improved the application of saliva ban to prevent abuse aimed at forcing the ball change.
What will change
* Using saliva remains prohibited, but the referees are not obliged to change the ball immediately.
* The ball will only be replaced if its condition has been drastically changed (eg too wet or too shiny).
* The final decision consists of discretion of the referee.
* If the judges claim that the saliva has not affected the ball, and later behaves unusually, the ball cannot be changed.
* In such a scenario, the launch party will still be five penalty runs.
Enhance Reviews DRS
1. Chronological revision process
If the player and the arbitration in the field refer to separate incidents in the same delivery, the TV referee will check them in the order in which it occurred.
2. Secondary release mode
When the dough is distributed and reviewed by decisions, the second way of release (if applicable) will now also apply the original “out” decision as the default.
For example:
The dough is distributed and controlled.
Replays shows no bat, but the ball hit the pads.
The TV referee will then check LBW.
In this case, the original decision remains “outside”.
So if the ball monitoring returns the “Referee call”, the dough will still be distributed.
Mile
Although the delivery is later found as a non-mock, justice of the catch must now be reviewed.
What will change
* Previously, if it was identified without a ball during reasoning, the catch revision was skipped.
* Now the TV referee must still check that the catch was clean.
* If it was fair, the bats team gets only a run without the ball.
* If not fair, they get all the completed runs plus ne-ball.
Deliberate short runs
The updated rule tightens the response to deliberately incomplete runs admitted to fraud or gain an advantage.
What will change
* If the dough is intentionally captured so that it does not cover, it can find who will remain on the strike.
* The five -member sentence still applies to the launch party.
* If the short -term course was indeed interrupted without deceiving, no sanction is imposed.
* According to Rule 18.5.1, only if there is a clear intention to simulate the completed running.
Replacing injuries soon in test cricket?
The substitute rule of shocks, introduced in the international cricket in 2019, has already proved to be a game converter. Now, in order to better manage serious injuries in longer formats, ICC approved an attempt to compensate for full -time compensation in home first -class cricket.
Cricket has long been one of the few team sports that do not allow compensation for full injury. This often left teams at a significant disadvantage when the player is injured during the match – especially in longer formats. ICC seems to be addressing this gap.
What will change
* Teams can replace players with full -time replacement. The exchange should be similar.
* Injuries must be external, obvious and visible for the match officials.
* It does not apply to internal or minor injuries such as muscle strokes or convulsions.
* This is the rule of court proceedings and acceptance is optional for Member States.
– ends
Published:
Akshay Ramesh
Published on:
June 26, 2025
