Rishabh Pant throws a ball frustrated after the referee’s change denies a change During the tense moment in the English shifts in Headingley, Indian vice -president Rishabh Pant faces potential ICC sanctions after the frustration of the referee’s decision to apply for the ball change. The incident developed after the penultimate delivery of 61. When Mohammed Siraj hit four ramp Harry Brook over slipping, leading to an animated protest of a panty and subsequent events that could break more ICC Code articles. The situation escalated when pants, dissatisfied with the state of the ball, approached the referee Paul Reiffel for the inspection. Despite the reiffel test with a ball meter that indicates any problems, the hinge in his attraction of the ball change persisted. After the refusal of his request, the judge responded by throwing the ball back into the ground before leaving the scene, calling on the Boos from the head of Headingley. Former Indian coach Ravi Shastri, commented on the incident, said, “If you want to sometimes want to change the ball, it is a clear indication that nothing happens. We want something to happen. And that was frustration.”
Inde vs ENG: RISHABH PANT OPEN ON Chemistry with SHUBMAN GILL AND ENGLAND CHALLENGE
Mark Butcher, a co -founder, said, “I’m not sure it is needed. Pant actions could potentially violate two specific articles on the ICC Code. Article 2.8 It deals with a disagreement in the decision of the referee, which could be classified as a level of level 1 or level 2, in particular according to the clause point. (A) for manifestation of excessive disappointment and clause h) for involvement in the long -term discussion of the decision. The second possible violation falls below Article 2.9, which specifically prohibits “throwing the ball on or near the referee in an inappropriate manner”. This crime also has potential levels of level 1 and level 2. Quiz: Who is the IPL player? The controversy continued to affect the game when the referee made several ball inspections in the following. Members of the SHUBMAN GILL team and Jasprit Bumrah were observed about the problem of officials. At that time, the situation of the matches showed England at 276-5 in response to the first Indian occurrences a total of 471, while Mohammed Siraj managed to release Ben Stokes shortly after the incident. The incident emphasizes the growing tension in the match and raises questions about the behavior of players and its consequences under ICC regulations. The reaction of the control body to Pant’s Actions remains to be perceived because the match is constantly developing in the headingley.
