New Delhi: The debut of the captain of SHUBMAN GILL in Headingley could not be more impressive on the cricket front. The 25 -year -old led from the front with the best career of 147 and anchored Indian shifts in the first test against England. But while his tabs caused praise, it was his socks It had fans – and probably officials – spoke.Live: India vs England 1. Test day 2On day 1, Gill lifted her eyebrows by adopting the fields into black socks – direct violations of ICC clothing and equipment that order players in the test cricket to wear white, cream or light gray socks. There is a rule to preserve the traditional, uniform appearance of the oldest format of the game.
Dominant India 1. Day! Jaiswal & Gill Hit Century | ENG VS Ind 1. Test – Zdo from Leeds
Go beyond the border with our YouTube channel. Subscribe!According to the ICC code, the first crime may lead to rebuke, while repeated violations within 12 months escalate to 25%, 50%or even 75%of the fees for a match. If Gill is found guilty of a deliberate offense of level 1, he could face an immediate fine of 10 to 20% of his income.However, the message seems to have been delivered. On the 2nd day, viewers with sharp eyes noticed that Gill had passed to white socks, indicating either a silent reminder from the team leadership or ICC officials.Gill renewed his shifts to 127 and continued the score of elegant 147, attached with 19 four and six before falling into the Shaib Bashir. His 209-run partnership of the fourth goal with Rishabh Pant (scored by his own) took India around 400. Despite the mini-laps, which left them 454/7 at lunch, the Indian fortress remained solid.While the episode “Black Socks” may seem in comparison with Gill’s hero Gill trivial, this could still lead to an official remark from the ICC. The referee of the match now holds the power to determine whether the violation was accidental or intentional – and whether Gill’s change to white socks was too small, too late.
