The EC clerk said: “Any misinformation that is spreading is not only a sign of disrespect for the law, but also brings the thunder to thousands of representatives named their own political party and demotivates the Lakh election employees who work tirelessly and transparently during the elections.” File | Photo Credit: Special Arrangement
On the day when the opposition leader at Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, he equalized the accusation of inconsistencies in the elections to the Mahashtra Assembly, the Electoral Commission (EC) again stated that it was “absurd” to slander the voting authority of “any disadvantageous verdict of voters”.
Watch | Election Commission calls gender demands in Maharashtra ‘absurd’ | Video credit: Hindi
In articles published in different languages in various publications on Saturday (June 7, 2025), the MP Congress claimed that the result of 2024 Maharashtra Assembly was “revenge” and “scope of equipment” was so desperate that despite all efforts to hide it, he is told about official statistics. involving captivity of our national institutions ”.
The opposition leader raised the problem previously in Lok Sabha and at a joint press conference with other opposition parties and during his tour to the United States.
The body of voting 24 December 2024, written in a congress explaining its position. In April also refuted similar accusations to Mr. Gandhi in the US
EC sources on Saturday (June 7, 2025) stated that the survey authority has already developed a procedure for updating election roles. Any deletion and completion of the election role is strictly according to the framework pursuant to Article 324 of the Constitution, the provisions of the Act on the Representation of the People of 1950 and the registration of the 1960 voters’ voters, as well as existing instructions issued by the Commission from time to time.
The process was carried out in a full view of 1,03,727 agents at the level of the stand mentioned by political parties, including 27,099 agents by the Indian National Congress (INC). After the Finalization of the Electoral Rolls During the Maharashtra Election, Out of the 9,77,90,752 Electors, Only 89 APPEALS WERE FILED BEFORE OF THE FIRST AUTHORITE (District Magistrate) UNDER SECTION 24 (A) APPEAL WAS PREFERRED BEFORE The Second Appellate Authority (Chief Electoral Officer) UNDER SECTION 24 (B) of the Same Act.
Section 24 of the 1961 Act says that the appeal can first be submitted to the district judge (DM) and then with the main election officer. Pursuant to Rule 27 Registration of the 1960 voters’ voter rules may be filed within 15 days of the order of the electoral registration clerk and the second appeal to the main election official can be submitted within 30 days of the DM order. However, the delay in the lodging of the appeal may be convicted of DM and/or the main election official according to the habitat of Rule 27.
“No appeal so far”
Sources in the Commission stated that more than one stall officers in Maharaštře are still waiting for such “wild accusations” to be transformed into at least one real appeal before the district judges under section 24 of the RP 1950 Act.
The EC clerk said: “Any misinformation that is spreading is not only a sign of disrespect for law, but also brings the thunder to thousands of representatives mentioned by their own political party and demotivates the Lakh election employees who work tirelessly and transparently during the elections.”
“After any unfavorable voter judgment, it is to try to slander the Electoral Commission by being endangered is completely absurd,” he added.
Congress leader Pawan Khera replied to the EC response and said Mr. Gandhi owned an article that he wrote about the “stolen elections” of Maharaštra. “The unsigned ECI reaction is another dishonest attempt to submit transparency in the election process,” he said at X.
Published – June 7, 2025 03:45
