Sharmistha Panoli line: On Tuesday, the High Court in Calcutta refused to grant the interim bail of the Instagram content of Sharmistha Panoli and noted that freedom of expression does not give the person to the “will to continue harm”.
Instagram influence and student of law-shamistha Panoli-with found himself at the Center for the alleged controversial statement in the now Smart Videos against the Community as a result of the Sindoor operation. Police Kolkata arrested her last week after a company was filed against her.
Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, who presides the matters and at the same time denies the bail of ad-interior, said, “Look, we have freedom of words, but that does not mean that you will hurt others,” he said.
The judge also remarked: “Our country is diverse, with people from different caste, religion and religion. We must be careful.
Viral video Sharmistha Panoli
Panoli was arrested for alleged controversial notes criticizing Bollywood celebrities for their “silence” on “Operation Sindoor”. Her now deleted video had “derogatory and disrespectful” comments focused on a particular religious community, the police said.
After the video became viral, #arrestsharmishta also began to trend at X. Social media users flooded the Comment section in the Sharmistha Instagram post, led her to delete the video and publish a public apology.
After her arrest, Panol was made before Alipore Court in Calcutta on Saturday, which filed it for 14 days.
What argued Sharmishty Panoli?
During the case of hearing the lawyer Sharmistha Panoli claimed that her arrest was illegal, because the accusation mentioned in the company was invisible and was not a previous announcement-what would be compulsory under the new BNSS laws.
Previously, her lawyer, MD Samimuddin, also stated that Panoli’s health was getting worse due to poor hygiene and lack of medical care in the Women’s Corrective House of Alipore.
Fees against Sharmistha Panoli
As Pol Police Sources, The Against Panoli Was Lodged Under Sections 196 (1) (A) Promoting EnMity Between Different Groups on Grounds of Religion, Race, Place of Birth, Residence, Language, Caste, Or Community, 299 Religious Feelings of Any Class of Citizens), 352 (intentional insult with the intent to provoke and Breach of Peace), 353 (1) (C) (statement that stimulate public mischief) BNSS, said ht.
(Tagstotranslate) Shamistha panoli video
