On Wednesday, Professor Ashok explained the University of Ali Khan Mahmudabad – accused of having disputed contributions to the social media for Sindoor operation – that while his right to freedom remains unaffected, he is excluded to publish anything online related to investigated cases.
As stated, the bench, including Judge Surya Kant and Dipankar Dative during a partial day, refused to adjust the condition of the Provisional Deposit set by 21 May, which prohibits Mahmudabad to write any online posts, articles or show manifestations of two specific online posts.
The Supreme Court also prevented the professor to express any opinion on the terrorist attack on Indian soil or countermeasures that gave the Indian armed forces.
The bench said it was expanding the temporary bail awarded to the professor and ordered the SIT to provide an investigation report on the next date of hearing.
The Supreme Court made it clear that the subject of the investigation was two FIRs filed against the professor and asked the Police Haryan not to go left and right in the investigation, looking for a “facility” that the cops said they would like to explore.
The bench also asked the Police Haryan to inform her about their response to the NHRC announcement to register companies against the professor.
21st May, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) stated that in connection with the arrest it took the “suo motu of knowledge” of the media report.
The rights panel noted that “the report containing the essence of the accusation, on the basis of the fact that he was arrested, published, Prima facie, that the human rights and freedom of the professor were violated”.
21st May the Supreme Court awarded the Professor of the Provisional Deposit, who was arrested for his controversial contributions on the Social Media for Sindoor surgery, but refused to remain an investigation against him. He ordered the establishment of a three -member SIT to look at the fir fir against him.
Police Haryan arrested Mahmudabad 18 May after two fir registered against him. It is said that his controversial contributions to the social media about the Sindoor operation threatened the sovereignty and integrity of the country.
Two companies – one based on the complaints of the President of the State Commission Haryan for Women, Rena Bhatia and the other on the complaint of the village of Sarpanch – was filed by the Rai Police in the Sonipat district.
“Complaints of the chairman of the Commission were filed against Professor Ali of Ashok University according to BNS sections 152 (deeds threatening sovereignty or unity and integrity of India), 353 (statement for public misfortune), police actions focused on insulting women) and 196 (1) basis of representatives), “shelf on the basis of religion),” shelves on the basis of religion). said.
Several political parties and academics condemned arrests.
(Tagstotranslate) sc
