The NHRC took the Suo Motu knowledge of the media report on arrest and in relation to Professor Ashoka University Ali Khan Mahmudabad in Haryana. The NHRC claimed that “human rights and professor” were violated in the arrest of political science. In a letter to the CEO of the police, Haryan, called for a detailed report on this matter within one week.
Professor Ashoka University Ali Khan Mahmudabad was awarded the Supreme Indian Court. Surya Kant said, “When the choice of words is intentionally created to insult, humiliation or causing discomfort to other persons, the learned professor cannot have a lack of verbal words … He could tell the same feelings in a simple language without hurting others.
What is the case of Ali Khan Mahmudabad?
The case of Ali Khan Mahmudabad concerns Professor Ashok University, who was arrested in May 2025 by Police Haryan after Facebook, who performed a “Sindoor operation” – a retaliatory strike against Pakistan after a terrorist attack in Pahalgam.
Against Professor Ashok University, two companies were registered in different parts of BNS, including accusations related to the threats of national security and statements that are likely to cause disharmony.
Mahmuadabada, the Haryan State Commission, also caused Mahmuadabada over the accusations of insulting the modesty of women through his functions.
Who is Ali Khan Mahmudabad?
Ali Khan Mahmudabad is a historian, political scientist and publicist.
He holds PhD and MPHil of the University of Cambridge and a university degree in history and political science at Amherst College.
He also studied Arabic at the University of Damascus.
What did Mahmudabad say in his Facebook post?
In his notes, Mahmudabad said: “The optics of two female soldiers who present their findings are important, but the optics must be reality on Earth, otherwise it is just hypocrisy (sic).”
The Commission interpreted its remarks as a “attempt to despair of national military actions”.
Mahmudabad’s post on Facebook about the women’s army officers
In his post on Facebook, Mahmudabad also condemned “lynching” and “arbitrary bulldozing”.
“I am very glad to see so many right -wing wings commentators applauding Colonel Sophia Qureishi, but maybe they could also demand the victims of MOB lynching, arbitrary bulldozing and others who are the victims of BJP hate, protected as Indian citizens.”
The Supreme Court grants a temporary bail of Mahmudabad
The Supreme Court granted the temporary bail of Ali Khan Mahmudabad, but refused to remain ongoing investigation and ordered the CEO of Haryana to create a special investigation team (SIT) consisting of higher IPS officers of the outer Haryana and Delhi to investigate the matter thoroughly.
The court imposed strict conditions on Mahmudabad, which prevented him from publishing or commenting on the subject of the case or the recent Indo-Pak conflict and ordered him to give up his passport.
The bench was also criticized by Ali Khan Mahmudabad’s selection of words in posts and described them as “dog whistles” – coded language designed to insult or provoke certain groups – and admonished him for seeking “cheap popularity” at a sensitive time for the nation.
What did the Haryan women’s panel claim?
Rena Bhatia, chairwoman of the committee, said the panel that the Panel took the Motu of the knowledge of the notes of Ali Khan Mahmudabad pursuant to Section 10 (1) (a). (F) and 10 (1) (a). A) of the Act on the State Commission in Haryana in 2012.
The announcement emphasizes six concerns: disregarding women in uniform, such as Colonel Sofiya Qureshi and the commander of the wing of Singh; Abuse of expressions such as “genocide” and “dehumanization”; coating military actions against cross -border terrorism; risking municipal unrest; violations of women’s dignity under the Constitution and Bharatiya nyaya Sanhita; and violation of ethical instructions for the Faculty of Commission for University Grants.
What did NHRC say? Complete statement
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India came across a news report of 20 May 2025 concerning the arrest and accession to the custody of Professor Ashok (considered a university) in Haryana.
The Commission noted that a report that contains the essence of the accusation based on the fact that it was arrested, published, Prima Facia, that the human rights and freedom of that professor were violated. Therefore, it was considered a suitable reason to realize Suo Motu recognition of the reported incident.
In accordance with this, he issued the announcement to the CEO of Haryana and called for a detailed report on the matter within one week.
(Tagstotranslate) Ashoka University (T) Ali Khan Mahmudabad (T) Supreme Court
