The Trinamool Congress MEP Mahua Moitr received relief from the High Court in Delhi after the leader of BJP Nishikant Dubey and defending Jai Anant Dehai agreed to accuse her contributions on social media for misconduct.
Moitra filed a slander lawsuit and claimed that she had shared the accusation via Dubey’s Facebook post and Tweet Dehadrai – containing his reputation were unfounded and harmful.
Also, read: “They hate hate speeches cannot be tolerated,” says SC baking BJP MP Nishikant Dubey – “courts are not as fragile as flowers …”
On the hearing held on Friday, Dubey and Dehadrai, the court reported that they would eliminate the contributions to the social media and offer Moitra a partial relief in its case of gossip.
According to Bare and Bench, the head of lawyer Abhimanyu Bhandari, representing the Nishikant Dubey, argued before the High Court in Delhi that the social media contribution was based on the Lokpal command associated with the Central Investigation Office (CBI).
Also read: The Supreme Court will not entertain the contempt for MP BJP Nishikant Dubey, but promises…
In the paper on X, MP TMC, he wrote: “The Supreme Court called Hon’ble a gentleman” highly irresponsible “,” unconscious “,” absurd “,” biased “,” scandalous “and” poorly intentional “. No me 🤫. ”
The slander, filed in 2023 Mahua Moitr, focuses on what she described as false and slanderous accusations that accuse her of receiving bribes in exchange for asking questions in parliament.
Dubey claimed that Moitra took bribes from the entrepreneur and CEO of the Hiranandani Group Darshan Hiranandani to get specific questions in Lok Sabha.
He founded these statements on a letter received by Jai Anant Dehadrai, who allegedly provided “irrefutable” evidence supporting accusations of bribery.
The accusation was unfounded and harmful to its reputation.
Moitr, however, according to the report, rejected any misconduct and claimed that the claims were politically managed and aim to harm its reputation.
(With the entry from agencies)
The Supreme Court called Hon’ble Gentleman “highly irresponsible”, “unconscious”, “absurd”, “biased”, “scandalous” and “poorly intentional”.
(Tagstotranslate) mahua mahua
