View of the Supreme Court building in Karnataka. | Photographic credit:
On Friday, the Karnatak High Court dismissed the petition filed by Bhavani Revanna for postponing a court proceedings in one of the four cases of rape against her son Prajwal Revann until he received enough time to appoint a new defense attorney and certified copy of certain documents and orders approved by the court court.
Justice S. Vishwajith Shetty, who heard the petition, rejected her that the reasons for release would follow.
What did the petition say
In the petition, she complained that the judge of a special court for criminal cases against current and former deputies and the MLA orally made certain unfavorable remarks against her son, for which he filed an action for a change of the judge. Although it seems that the main city civic judge and the judge dismissed such an action for a change of the judge, she is not a copy of the order or prajwal.
Mrs. Bhavani also pointed out that a lawyer representing her son had left the case and a special court did not give him enough time to appoint another advocate, but appointed a lawyer from the legal service office.
Delay tactics
However, the lawyer representing CID opposed her claim that Prajwal was supposed to submit a petition and at the same time pointed out that events such as the advocate, retiring from one of the four cases of rape, is nothing but tactics to delay the proceedings because the court proceedings are initiated by a statement of victims and other witnesses.
Published – 2 May 2025 9:13
