Congress and opposition leader in the pandjab of Partap Singh Bajwa. | Photo Credit: PTI
The political atmosphere in the pandjab remained on Tuesday (April 15, 2025) accused, surrounding the commentary on the alleged existence of “grenade bombs” in the state, because the key political parties were involved in clearing on security sensitive.
The workers and leaders of Congress presented a demonstration in Mohali in the Sahibzada district Ajit Singh Nagar against the ruling side of Aam Aadmi (AAP) for registering companies against the leader of Partap Singh Bajwa, even though Mr. Bajwa appeared before the police in Mohali for investigations. They claimed that the company was motivated from “political vendeta” to focus on Congress.
The AAP leaders and workers also organized a protest and condemned Mr. Bajwa’s note. President AAP Pandjab Aman Arara said: “Bajwski unfounded claims about 50 grenades entering a pandjab are an attempt to create panic and disrupt peace renewed under the rule of AAP.”
Mr. Bajwa appeared before the police in connection with the case. The Pandjab Police on April 13 registered companies against Mr. Bajwa according to sections 197 (1) (D) (false and misleading information that threatens the sovereignty and unity of the country) and 353 (2) (false statements to create hostility and poor will) Bharatiya Nyaya (BNS).
While both Congress and AAP organized demonstrations against each other, Bharatiya Amber Party (BJP) and Shiromans Akali Dal (Sad) described their policy as “solid match” and “drama”.
The head of the sad leader Bikram Singh Majithia accused AAP and Congress of joining each other to indulge in a “drama” of the comment instead of working to improve the situation in the area of law and order in the state. In his statement, Mr. Majithia said: “The truth was that AAP and Congress were members of the Indian alliance. Both parties attacked both the parliamentary elections in Chandigarh and the mayors of the Alliance elections.
President Pandjab Bjp Sunil Sunhar claimed that AAP and Congress played a “firm match” in a sensitive problem and “pushed the panda on the brink of chaos by exposing cheap policy”.
Published – April 15 2025 21:08
