Representative image of the hammer Photo Credit: Reuters
On Tuesday (April 15, 2025), the Supreme Court expressed confusion in repeated judicial observations in orders coming from the High Court in Allahabad, one of the oldest and largest constitutional courts in the country and showed insensitive views of women.
Days after the only judge of the Supreme Court, Judge Ram Manohar Narayan Mishhra concluded that the grinding of the minor and the violation of her pajama chain did not contribute to a serious crime of an attempt to rape, another judge of the same chief judge, Judge Sanjay Kumar Singh, awarded rape “
“Why do all these observations?”
“What is happening in this High Court? Now is he another judge from the same High Court who says such things … Why do all these observations? One must be very careful with these cases that are so sensitive,” said Judge Br Gavai, who is heading on the bench with the justice Ag Masih.
The court listened to the SUO Moto case about the order approved by the judiciary Misra 17. March.
“Justice should not only be done, but it would be necessary to do. What will an ordinary person perceive from these notes?” The lawyer Tushar Mehta, who helps the top court in the case of Suo Mot, has submitted.
The bench postponed the case of the Suo Mot and noted that the service between the parties was incomplete.
17 March Judge Misra said that both accusations may be at best accused of a minor offense of “outrage of modesty” for the child’s sexual assault and violation of pajama strings.
According to the version of the criminal prosecution, the duo of the victim gave a lift on the bike, grabbed her breasts, broke her pajama chain, and tried to drag it under the culvert before fled when they saw them.
“The measures concerned committed with a clear sexual intention are direct steps to support rape and should not be rejected as a mere” outrage of modesty “. It is presented by respondents (accused), have not ceased to commit a crime voluntarily, rather forced to flee from Assion Plasels. Represented, represented by children.
The Supreme Court, at the end of March, remained in Allahabad High Court Regulation March 17.
The High Court’s order was based on an inspection action filed by the accused against the summons of the Court on the basis of accusations of rape.
The Top Court noted that the command of the High Court was “completely insensitive, inhuman” and “unknown principles of law”.
Justice Gavai pointed out that some paragraphs of the order that graphically told the trauma that was launched by a minor victim in the hands of two accused people, only to conclude that their actions showed no determination of the duo to rape it.
Published – April 15 2025 02:10
