The High Court of Karnataka Has Directed the Tahsildar, Ramanagara, To, With, Within and Week, Give All Documents, Based on WHICH AND NOTICE WASSUED TO UNIVA HD KUMARASWAMY TO SHOW-CAUSE WHY AND CRIMINAL CASE Encroaching Upon Certain Portions of Government Lands in Survey Numbers 7, 8, and 9 of the Kethaganahalli Village of Bidadi Hobli of Ramanagara Taluk.
Answer the Notification
Meanwhile, the court ordered Mr. Kumaraswamy to answer the announcement within two weeks after receiving documents from Tahsildar.
Judge NS Sanjay Gowda approved the Provisional Order on Tuesday, while by April 22, another hearing of the petition filed by Mr. Kumaraswamy, who challenged the legality of the announcement issued by Tahsildar on March 18.
The court also stated that there is no need to remain further proceedings on the notification issued by Tahsildar, because it was clear that Tahsildar would consider the objection to Mr. Kumaraswamy before the acceptance of any command to evict.
What the petition claims
The petition was claimed that Tahsildar had no power to issue a notice, because such a power was entrusted to the Commissioner’s assistant under the provisions of the Karnataka Act (KLR) of 1964. It was also stated in the petition that she did not provide all documents in the petition.
Mr. Kumaraswamy claimed that in 1985-87 he bought several land in the village of Kethaganahalli through various registered sales lists and all documents clearly and categorically justify that his dealers had the right, title and interest in these land. Mr. Kumaraswamy has been in the statutory possession of these countries over the last four decades, has been stated in the petition.
Meanwhile, the court allowed Mr. Kumaraswamy to question the legality of certain changes made by the KRR Act during 2024-25.
Published – April 9, 2025 17:58
