New Delhi: The three-member Committee of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), which has established to explore the accusation of Lovlin Borgohain of the gross behavior of the Boxing Federation of the Indian (BFI) Executive Director ARUN Malik, found no evidence of “gender-discrimination” behavior that learned about Tokyo Olympiis Broner boxer. evidence of “gender” behavior that they learned about Tokyo Olympiis. The Committee, WHICH COMPISED TARGET OLYMPIC Podium Scheme Federation (NSF) ADOPT and MORE Flexible Approach in Dealing With Their Sportspersons and Implement An “Athlete-Ccentric” and strategy “Athlete-First”. Lovlina, a former world -class world champion, was accused by Malika of disrespectful and rough behavior showing gender bias during the TopS meeting held on the 8th of July of this year’s zoom. After her complaints, IOA created a led PT Usha panel under the leadership of a sports ministry. The clerk informed about the development that the committee reviewed the 45 -minute video of the meeting to explore the accusation of Lovlina. It was noted that while Malik disagreed with Loven’s request for Pranamics Boro as her personal trainer for his own benefit and improvement of the boxer and spoke loudly and authoritatively during the meeting, his behavior cannot be interpreted as a disrespectful lovin. “Video recording helped the Committee to achieve an informed decision. The Committee found no evidence concerning Malik’s behavior, saying that he had sex-discriminatory undertones. However, he should have been more flexible in listening to what the hunter demanded and showed calm, it must be limited when he says it is, that it The most modern or any steps in this matter will be taken by USHA and the ministry, ”the official said. It was found that the Committee had submitted its report both IOA and the Ministry some time ago, but the findings have not yet been published. Also, the finding was not shared with Lovlin and Malik.
