Veteran of the former Chief Minister and Congress AK Antony’s public expression of “despair” over the “emergency but legally inevitable” circumstances that led to the police event in Sivagiri Madhom in 1995, and the deadly forces against Adivasis without land, which were summarized in the previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous previous Previous and Adivasis, which have been hit by previous previous previous queues). the government.
The ruling queue looked joyful that Mr. Antony “reopened the old wounds” in the election year. In particular, the Minister of Pravo P rajeeve joked on Thursday in the assembly that Mr. Antony’s admission “turned the door” to publicly put LDF to judge his “violations of human rights and doubtful laws and order”.
Secretary General AICC KC Venugopal repeated that the “record” conversation of Mr. Antony’s face in the face of the LDF attack in the assembly was healthy and undamaged.
Madhom was divided
Meanwhile, the leadership of Sivagiri Madhom has emerged on whether the police action in a spiritual center founded by the social reformer Sree Narayan Guru was morally justifiable.
President Madhom Swami Satchidananda said that the aggressive resistance from established entities against an attempt by the newly elected committee to take over the Office in a turbulent year that was an inevitable police intervention.
On the other hand, the Secretary General of Madhom SWAMI, Shaubhangananda, accused Mr. Antony of rejection of more limited possibilities, including the appeal against the “order to one bench” that promotes the transfer of power. “The wounds caused at the inner self of the Sree Narayan community will not heal or forget,” he added.
K. Gopinathan, Secretary General of SNDP Yogamu in 1995, claimed that the Commission of Judge Balakrishhnan Zambiar, who probed the police action, recorded deep skepticism about the determination of the government of Antony’s government to adapt to the problem.
He said his call for Mr. Antony to consider a more measured approach to solving the highly emotional problem of Sivagiri, proved to be futile. “Mr. Antony released the police at Sivagiri remotely coconut in Delhi,” he added.
You will be able to release
Meanwhile, TA and M.Geethanandan, who led the Muthang campaign, argued that the Antony’s government used an “insignificant letter” written by a medium serial officer in the Ministry of Forest Union to permit a fatal police event that resulted in the death of Adivas and a police officer.
“The then Minister of Forest K. Sudhan and the then President KPCC K. Muraleedharan played the second violin,” Geethanandan added.
Mr. Antony said he managed to go through the subject. “A running comment on a settled matter is not my style,” he added.
Published – September 18 2025 21:24
