The exception of removing golden copper coverage from the “Dwarapalaka” idols in the Sabarimala Temple and their transport to the Chennai company to restore without informing about the special commissioner and the court concerning the entire process concerning the process concerning the process.
The court stated that there were free goals in this matter that required immediate clarification. On Wednesday, the court ordered the covers to be brought back to Sabarimala and TDB replied that it would be difficult from the beginning of the renewal. He was also looking for time to complete the electrical process.
In the Suo Mot on Friday, she said the defects within six years of the release of the Gold in 2019 showed a division bench of justice RajavijayaraGhavan V. and the judiciary KV Jayakumar, although it was guaranteed that it was guaranteed by six years after gold. The golden emergence was sponsored by the resident of Bengalur Unnikrishnan Potty.
Change of attitude
The court noted that Commissioner Thiruvabharanam recorded in a communication recorded by an executive official, on July 30 that certain parts of the Dwarapalak had already been covered with gold and that intelligent creations in electroly, Chennai, lacked technical knowledge to remove the existing coat. He then stated that the court not only marked the traditional method of gold cladding.
8th August the Commissioner reversed his attitude, allegedly after discussions with a sponsor. He has issued another road that recommended that components closed with gold be transported to intelligent creations for electric improvements.
The respondents seem to have ignored the mandate contained on page 152 for the details of the TravanCore Devaswom Board, which insists that repairs must be carried out in Sannidhanam itself, the court said.
The sponsor has expired
Taking acknowledging that the complete set of records concerning gold/gold garment Dwarapalakas is maintained by Commissioner Thiruvabharanam in his Aranmule office, the court ordered the main superintendent (alertness) and security officer) and security officer)
The court also showed Suo Moto Mr. Potty and intelligent creations as other respondents. Mr. Potty must also include his / her income tax records and records of the amount he spent through his bank accounts by sponsorship.
Published – September 12, 2025 20:22 is
