The Directive of the Supreme Court to eliminate all stray dogs from the streets in Delhi and the region of the capital and permanently caused them in the shelters to divide their opinion – mostly increased outrage between lovers of dogs and activists for animal rights who ‘not feasible order’.
Several people who opposed the High Court’s judgment emphasized the unavailability of government shelters for dogs in the NCR area, where canines could be preserved.
Read | Case Stray Dogs Case Heard Live: Three-Judgy Benches of Order for Wokel Dogs
Mixed reactions to social media
The order triggered interviews on the social media, many commenting on the X. The user named Arun Prabhudesai, which is defined as the CEO of the Video House, supported the order and said he was a “parent of dogs” but also wants the directive to be implemented in Mahashtra. “Permanent dogs in India are not just an inconvenience; they are a threat,” he said.
The CEO made a comparison with other nations where dogs are not “danger of free radiation”.
“We have normalized cases of dog pieces, rabies death and aggressive packages of persecution of children, cyclists and delivery staff.
You don’t see it in any other country. Go to Singapore, Japan, Europe or the US, where dogs are pets and not a danger with free radiation.
Do not understand me badly, I love dogs, but I also like to see children playing in the park without fear, delivery agents run without being persecuted, and pedestrians walk without avoiding packaging.
This decision is very angry. But it could finally ensure that Indian cities were safer for people and the dogs themselves, ”Prabhudesai wrote.
Read | After the command to relocate the dog relocation in Delhi-NCR prohibits the Supreme Court the remaining food disposal in the court area
Another user believed that “dog lovers” are always of rich families that many in the comments sections. “The so -called dog lovers are almost always from a rich crowd. Their pampered children never go on their feet. £1 lakh per month, ”she wrote.
The third user, Mohit Chauhan, the cultural envoy of Mongolia to India, expressed the opposition to the order and said, “Delhi wandering dogs are not a threat. They are part of the ecosystem. Their brutal removal is that it is now a solution.
The fourth user suggested that dog lovers receive one stray dog to ease the problem. “If every dog lover on social media accepts one stray dog and keeps him at home, there will be no stray dogs.”
Criticism of the Supreme Court of the Office
At the beginning of the day, the Supreme Court strongly criticized the authorities, while hearing petitions that question his order. Another bench of the court asked why the authorities in several areas began to capture animals before publishing an earlier order. The Court also criticized the authorities for failing to carry out the instructions for control of animals that, according to whose objectives contributed to the current situation.
(Tagstotranslate) Reports about stray dogs
