
Priya Jain, the daughter of the deceased Davider Kumar Jain, founded the Luxor group in 1963, asked the Delhi High Court to cancel his recent decision to confirm the 2004 family, claiming to be created and unauthorized.
The questionable year of 2004 will cause USha Jain, the wife of the late patriarch, the only recipient of his assets worth hundreds of Cror and to leave all four children.
Priya filed a petition in front of the High Court in Delhi and questioned her previous order. Mint recorded a copy of the petition.
“The judgment, a free judge (bench) not only ignored the relevant facts, but also issued a judgment in contrast to established evidence and legal principles,” Priya said in her petition.
On May 27, the Delhi High Court issued an administrative letter regarding the disputed in December 2004 in his order, where he was made to the authorized accounting family by the executor of the will and usha Jain was the only recipient of will. In essence, the administrative letter gives the administrator the legal authority to deal with the assets of the deceased, repay the debts and distribute the remaining assets under the law.
Priya said that the judgment was fully fulfilled by basic legal and factual errors that guarantee its immediate separation. The judge “misinterpreted” moved the burden of proving the authenticity of the will from the petitioner “alleged” will to opponents (Priya Jain).
Landlessly, the petitioner is a person who submits the will of the court or other relevant authority for legal recognition. This person takes responsibility for proving the validity of the will and proves that they reflect the actual intentions of the testator and have been properly performed.
The Delhi High Court reserved its order for dispute on Thursday.
Davider Jain, who died on March 18, 2014, founded a group that has grown to a diversified business conglomerate of 27 closely held companies, with interests from stationery and plastic to hospitality and real estate. At the time of his death, the group was reportedly the value of hundreds of Crores.
After his demise, a witness petition was submitted in May 2014 in front of the Delhi High Court in May 2014 Sanjay Kalrou, a rented accountant who was looking for an exploration of the supposed will of 11 December 2004. her name.
Accusations of counterfeiting
This exclusion was the basis of the legal challenge in 2014 by Jain’s unmarried and dependent daughter Priya Jain, who lived with her father and actively involved in family affairs, which then claimed that the will was created.
She described the will of the “counterfeit and devised” document that pointed to several allegedly suspicious elements, including the wrong spelling of her father in the document, the absence of any heritage for children of the couple, the will is unregistered and reportedly written on the new document that lies in the document.
Even more importantly, Jain accused her mother and one of her brothers to join to take control of Luxor businesses and “forced” her approach to basic nutrition and legitimate heritage.
During the proceedings, two significant development changed the trajectory of the case. Both sisters Priya Jain withdrew their objections against the will after allegedly reached financial settlements with their mother – everyone said it was worth it £30 crore.
Meanwhile, the court rejected the request to send a controversial will for forensic analysis – a problem that has since become a dispute.
(Tagstotranslate) High Court judgment in Delhi