Manchester: Indian dough Kl Rahul and SHUBMAN GILL During the fourth day of the fourth test match between India and England, on the cricket playground Old Trafford, in England Manchester. (PTI Photo/R Senthilkucar) (PTI07_26_2025_000546B) Former England and Royal Challenges of Bengalur (RCB) All-Rounder Moeen Ali said that although SHUBMAN GILL scored the most runs in the recently closed Anderson-tendulkar trophy, he felt that he was the Opener of India Kl Rahul, who was the best body in terms of technology.“I think people do not realize how good someone like KL (Rahul) is,” Ali said on the Vouská in front of the Podcast goal.“Last year he was also great in England and was brilliant again in this series.“I know SHUBMAN scored the most runs and was excellent with brilliant technique. But I thought the role of KL in this side was probably the best I saw there to play there. He’s such a good player.“I really believe he’s one of the best players in the world – and I said it for a while.
India vs England Rain, weather forecast: Can SHUBMAN GILL-KL Rahul pull out stunning draws?
“Sometimes I feel that they will not remove the handbrake – it should just relax a little more. But in general, I would say it is one of the best players in the world.”Kl Rahul scored 532 runs on average 53, with two centuries in the test series of five matches.Adil Rashid also repeated Moeen’s City about Rahul.“It goes under the radar. But in this series, its pace, its technique excelled,” said Rashid.
Vote
Who do you think is a better dough based on technology: KL RAHUL or SHUBMAN GILL?
“When you talk about the art of launching in a test cricket-to-line, returning-there was a lot of it. His defense was solid, but when he was half Volley, he managed it even though he was caught.”“He had his game all right. He looked very comfortable, both in defense and in the attack. This is probably the first time we saw it throughout the five game section-who was constantly looking at the spot.”“This guy looks class. He looked really good in defense and attack.”
